birthday of two uncles
couldn't be more different
one mine, one his
Bill, subversively funny
Nuss, thoughtful and modest
both were my favourite
and both were his
birthday of two uncles
couldn't be more different
one mine, one his
Bill, subversively funny
Nuss, thoughtful and modest
both were my favourite
and both were his
whenever it rains
my knees and fingers ache:
human barometer
potential new career as
tv meteorologist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RE8a6zLe6KM
torn belt loop on jeans
needs sewing machine's strong thread
tailoring magic
Daily Haiku Prompt: thread
the aroma of
brewing coffee makes mornings
almost bearable
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcXiXDQAqak
Daily Haiku Prompt: aroma
a calendar page
noting my father's birthday
and the earth rotates
he took two-year-old me to
High Park to see the duckies
no ducks!
"duckies don't work
on Sunday"
he knew the exact wall
where Humpty Dumpty sat
(HD took lots of, um, breaks)
and the earth rotates
but memories remain
Daily Haiku Prompt: calendar
I suspect The Toronto Star, an award-winning newspaper, is highly dependent upon AI for proofreading, copy editing, and fact checking.
Lately I've noticed a lot more spelling errors. Sometimes they're even in big bold type: headlines.
Also I've seen homonyms misused. These are real words that sound the same as what should be there, but spelled incorrectly in that context.
Sometimes words are missing in a sentence.
All of these errors cause me to slow down, reread, and fill in the blanks correctly.
But worst of all is the lack of fact checking, which I only noticed in a recent travel article which referenced the movie, Roman Holiday. The article was delightfully written, but contained a mistake about the stars of the movie. Gregory Peck, not Robert Mitchum, starred with Audrey Hepburn.
A correctly spelled but wrong actor's name was printed.
And that means that no human was proofreading or fact checking!
It seems likely that the newspaper has replaced its copy editors and fact checkers with some equivalent of spell check. That is unacceptable for a good newspaper.
Because it's not very serious to misremember an actor in a film. But what about the facts that I don't notice because I don't know the subject?